Quem paga a conta do congestionamento do judiciário brasileiro?

Desafiando as premissas do PL nº 533/2019 sobre o acesso à justiça no Brasil

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the premises of the Project of law 533/2019 based on research data on access to justice in Brazil. The bill presents both in its text and in its justifications a reductionist perspective on litigation in the Brazilian context, which brings the need to create filters for access to justice based on the idea of ​​resisted pretension. The article analyzes data that explain the complexity of the litigation phenomenon in Brazil, the inequalities that mark access to justice and the path of conflict, as well as inequalities in access to the internet. The article defends those solutions based on efficient assumptions tend to influence legislative reforms that distance themselves from the equalization of access. The conclusions of the article points in the sense of tensioning the premises that mark the project, signaling possible contexts that may emerge with its approval.